Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 735 vs Qualcomm Adreno 725 vs Qualcomm Adreno 740

Qualcomm Adreno 735

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 735

The Qualcomm Adreno 735 (Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 GPU) is an integrated graphics unit (iGPU) for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip), the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 was unveiled at the end of 2023 and can be found in Android-based high-end devices in 2024.

According to initial benchmarks, the GPU's performance is between the Adreno 730 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The GPU supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (Bloom, Depth of Field, Motion Blur is accelerated). The following graphics APIs are supported: OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.3.

Qualcomm Adreno 725

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 725

The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644.

The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.

Qualcomm Adreno 740

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 740

The Qualcomm Adreno 740 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2023 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno GPU offers a 25% improved performance compared to the Adreno 730 predecessor in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. First benchmarks show that the Adreno GPU can even beat the Apple A16 GPU (iPhone 14 Pro series) in synthetic benchmarks. Therefore, the Adreno 740 is the fastest graphics chip for smartphones in 2022.

The iGPU supports hardware accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (for bloom, depth of field and motion blur). Another first, is the support for Vulkan 1.3.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is produced in the modern 4nm process at TSMC.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 735Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 740
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement13.04.2024 30.11.2021 16.11.2022
CPU in Adreno 735GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 725GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 740GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 28 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
15748 Points (68%)
11837 Points (51%)
min: 12891     avg: 16677     median: 16746 (73%)     max: 18846 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
28632 Points (63%)
20476 Points (45%)
min: 25211     avg: 33069     median: 34390.5 (76%)     max: 38087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 7553     avg: 11252     median: 11751 (49%)     max: 13954 Points
10274 Points (43%)
min: 10839     avg: 14511     median: 14696.5 (62%)     max: 16291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 12176     avg: 18081     median: 19249.5 (48%)     max: 21647 Points
14801 Points (37%)
min: 18010     avg: 24115     median: 24891.5 (62%)     max: 26802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
14235 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
24605 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6661     avg: 11309     median: 12039 (6%)     max: 12985 Points
7701 Points (4%)
min: 9805     avg: 13918     median: 14012 (7%)     max: 14789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1659     avg: 2926     median: 3076 (4%)     max: 3332 Points
1968 Points (2%)
min: 3088     avg: 3641     median: 3700 (4%)     max: 3900 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 20.4     median: 21 (8%)     max: 24 fps
16 fps (6%)
min: 18     avg: 29.3     median: 30 (11%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 44     avg: 48.6     median: 48 (9%)     max: 55 fps
34 fps (6%)
min: 24     avg: 60.8     median: 62.5 (11%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 111     avg: 137.6     median: 136 (10%)     max: 185 fps
35 fps (3%)
min: 82     avg: 147.5     median: 155.5 (12%)     max: 181 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 92.9     median: 99 (9%)     max: 110 fps
79 fps (7%)
min: 67     avg: 120.2     median: 126 (12%)     max: 166 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 111     avg: 166.6     median: 171 (4%)     max: 200 fps
137 fps (3%)
min: 108     avg: 199.4     median: 213 (5%)     max: 226 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 170     avg: 243.4     median: 265 (11%)     max: 287 fps
232 fps (10%)
min: 115     avg: 277.5     median: 288 (12%)     max: 346 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 735
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 292     avg: 430.1     median: 451 (4%)     max: 520 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725
359 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 740
min: 301     avg: 456.8     median: 480.5 (4%)     max: 502 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 360377     avg: 467209     median: 485070 (49%)     max: 538320 Points
min: 333810     avg: 347058     median: 347058 (35%)     max: 360306 Points
min: 449271     avg: 555498     median: 570026 (57%)     max: 590837 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 294513     avg: 474851     median: 505042 (40%)     max: 532103 Points
min: 469023     avg: 583912     median: 590587 (47%)     max: 611661 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 179.33     avg: 187     median: 187 (5%)     max: 194.7 fps
120.9 fps (3%)
min: 208.55     avg: 211     median: 210.4 (5%)     max: 214.17 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 8771     avg: 8905     median: 8844 (2%)     max: 9172 Points
4056 Points (1%)
min: 6548     avg: 8858     median: 8918 (2%)     max: 9784 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 9821     avg: 9981     median: 9942 (2%)     max: 10263 Points
5338 Points (1%)
min: 3587     avg: 9009     median: 9361 (2%)     max: 10144 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
38490 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
60368 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7.33     avg: 10.3     median: 10.8 (4%)     max: 12.1 Watt
6.3 Watt (2%)
min: 3.83     avg: 9.5     median: 9.7 (4%)     max: 14.5 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 735 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 69% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 117% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 735:
59.2  fps
101%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 735:
59.1  fps
102%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 735:
29.4 59.5 ~ 44 fps
127%
Adreno 725:
56  fps
134%
Adreno 740:
58.5 60.1 ~ 59 fps
med.
Adreno 740:
60.1  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 735:
29.9 51.8 59 59.2 60 ~ 52 fps
62%
Adreno 725:
32  fps
115%
Adreno 740:
59 59.2 59.6 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 725:
54  fps
Adreno 740:
59 60 60 60 60 61 63 117 119 120 ~ 78 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 735:
48.1 58.2 60 60 118 ~ 69 fps
87%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
104%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 87.5 87.8 89 90 90 ~ 72 fps
med.
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 735:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 740:
56.8 59 59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 735:
39 39.6 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 725:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 740:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 735:
60  fps
193%
Adreno 740:
116  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 740:
60  fps
high
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 740:
120  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 735 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 95%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 95%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 119%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 109%

Qualcomm Adreno 735Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 740
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.259.16060
Genshin Impact445256325960.160
PUBG Mobile69604060604072606040
Dead Trigger 260116
Qualcomm Adreno 735Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 740
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1





1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2


2


2

1
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 30. 00:49:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12721 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11440 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12721 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 12721 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0s ... 0.015s

#12 got single benchmarks 11590 +0s ... 0.015s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11440 +0s ... 0.015s

#14 got single benchmarks 11440 +0.028s ... 0.044s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.049s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.049s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.062s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.063s

#20 Got 130 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.083s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.083s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.083s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.086s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.086s

#25 return log +0s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)