Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 732 vs Qualcomm Adreno 710

Qualcomm Adreno 732

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 732

The Qualcomm Adreno 732 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced in March 2024 and can be found in many Android-based products in the upper mid-range and premium class.

According to rumors Qualcomm clocks the graphics chip at up to 950 MHz and uses two pipelines.

The performance is slightly above the Adreno 730 and below the 735 in our tests (as the name also suggests).

The Adreno 732 supports Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.1. AI upscaling should make it possible to increase frame rates and improve the efficiency of some graphic effects without any major battery load.

Qualcomm Adreno 710

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 710

The Adreno 710 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first installed in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The chip has been available since the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, which supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.13.

The GPU is able to control FHD+ displays with up to 144 Hz and offers support for HDR10 and HDR vivid.

Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 710
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement23.03.2024 30.11.2021
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 732GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 38 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 710GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 28 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5762 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
6231 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
7666 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
11506 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4087     avg: 4575     median: 4720.5 (23%)     max: 4773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3967     avg: 4639     median: 4845 (16%)     max: 4899 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 11512     avg: 11583     median: 11583 (6%)     max: 11654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2844     avg: 2976     median: 2975.5 (3%)     max: 3107 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 22     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (8%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 49     avg: 49.5     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 50 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 130.5     median: 130.5 (10%)     max: 131 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 105     avg: 109     median: 109 (10%)     max: 113 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 191     avg: 194.5     median: 194.5 (4%)     max: 198 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 271     avg: 284     median: 284 (12%)     max: 297 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 732
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 491     avg: 496     median: 496 (4%)     max: 501 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 710
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
455425 Points (46%)
min: 0     avg: 70941     median: 70940.5 (7%)     max: 141881 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 477453     avg: 485942     median: 485942 (39%)     max: 494430 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 148.7     avg: 170.1     median: 170.1 (4%)     max: 191.5 fps
min: 38.5     avg: 40.6     median: 40.5 (1%)     max: 42.67 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
38.5 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
7837 Points (2%)
min: 1323     avg: 1331     median: 1328.5 (0%)     max: 1344 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
9183 Points (2%)
min: 1637     avg: 1660     median: 1654 (0%)     max: 1689 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
43633 Points (15%)
min: 20418     avg: 26631     median: 27556.5 (9%)     max: 30991 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
54938 Points (91%)
min: 24021     avg: 26637     median: 26957 (45%)     max: 28612 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.05     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (4%)     max: 11 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 31% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 732:
59.9  fps
60%
Adreno 710:
29.9 29.9 30 30 59.2 ~ 36 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 732:
59.7  fps
55%
Adreno 710:
29.6 29.8 29.9 30 44.6 ~ 33 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 732:
58.1  fps
79%
Adreno 710:
28.8 43.8 47 47.1 49 59 ~ 46 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 732:
40.7 60 ~ 50 fps
74%
Adreno 710:
29.3 30 31 39 44 46.6 ~ 37 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 732:
87.1 89 ~ 88 fps
64%
Adreno 710:
39 58.6 58.8 59.3 59.6 60 60 ~ 56 fps
high
100%
Adreno 732:
60  fps
80%
Adreno 710:
30 39.7 40 58.8 59.6 60 ~ 48 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 732:
39.4 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 710:
39.7 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 732:
117  fps
51%
Adreno 710:
60 60 ~ 60 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 70%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 70%

Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 710
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.959.73633
Genshin Impact58.1504637
PUBG Mobile886040564840
Dead Trigger 211760
Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 710
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1





2

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3





1
1

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 05:01:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12763 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12307 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12763 +0.01s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 12763 +0s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12307 +0s ... 0.013s

#11 got single benchmarks 12307 +0.012s ... 0.026s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.028s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.04s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.04s

#16 Got 50 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.045s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.045s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.046s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.047s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.047s

#21 return log +0.001s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)