Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 725 vs Qualcomm Adreno 750

Qualcomm Adreno 725

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 725

The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644.

The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 750
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement30.11.2021 25.10.2023
CPU in Adreno 725GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11837 Points (51%)
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
20476 Points (45%)
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
10274 Points (43%)
min: 9984     avg: 16171     median: 17478 (74%)     max: 20131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
14801 Points (37%)
min: 22388     avg: 29106     median: 28984 (72%)     max: 33376 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
17553 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
29890 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7701 Points (4%)
min: 15108     avg: 18750     median: 19035 (10%)     max: 20321 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1968 Points (2%)
min: 3991     avg: 4752     median: 4765 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
16 fps (6%)
min: 27     avg: 36.1     median: 37 (14%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
34 fps (6%)
min: 43     avg: 75.1     median: 75 (13%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
35 fps (3%)
min: 92     avg: 186.4     median: 190 (14%)     max: 241 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
79 fps (7%)
min: 64     avg: 140.4     median: 147 (14%)     max: 162 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
137 fps (3%)
min: 90     avg: 240     median: 248 (5%)     max: 279 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
232 fps (10%)
min: 143     avg: 318.2     median: 326 (14%)     max: 387 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
359 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
min: 189     avg: 487.4     median: 512.5 (4%)     max: 549 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 333810     avg: 347058     median: 347058 (35%)     max: 360306 Points
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 537309     avg: 774773     median: 792034 (63%)     max: 927463 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
120.9 fps (3%)
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
4056 Points (1%)
min: 10798     avg: 14148     median: 14184 (4%)     max: 16784 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
5338 Points (1%)
min: 13579     avg: 15840     median: 16235 (4%)     max: 17531 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
6.3 Watt (2%)
min: 3.24     avg: 9     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 234% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 725:
56  fps
95%
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 725:
32  fps
178%
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 725:
54  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
147%
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
97%
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 725:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 123%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 117%

Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact56325359.857
PUBG Mobile60604088605840
Dead Trigger 280
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1





1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

1
1

2
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 05:09:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 11590 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.003s

#11 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.003s ... 0.006s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.006s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.009s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.009s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.016s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.016s

#17 Got 70 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.028s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.028s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.029s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.031s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.031s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.031s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)