Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 725 vs Qualcomm Adreno 732

Qualcomm Adreno 725

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 725

The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644.

The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.

Qualcomm Adreno 732

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 732

The Qualcomm Adreno 732 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced in March 2024 and can be found in many Android-based products in the upper mid-range and premium class.

According to rumors Qualcomm clocks the graphics chip at up to 950 MHz and uses two pipelines.

The performance is slightly above the Adreno 730 and below the 735 in our tests (as the name also suggests).

The Adreno 732 supports Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.1. AI upscaling should make it possible to increase frame rates and improve the efficiency of some graphic effects without any major battery load.

Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 732
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement30.11.2021 23.03.2024
CPU in Adreno 725GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 732GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 38 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11837 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
20476 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
10274 Points (43%)
7666 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
14801 Points (37%)
11506 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7701 Points (4%)
min: 11512     avg: 11583     median: 11583 (6%)     max: 11654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1968 Points (2%)
min: 2844     avg: 2976     median: 2975.5 (3%)     max: 3107 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
16 fps (6%)
min: 22     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (8%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
34 fps (6%)
min: 49     avg: 49.5     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 50 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
35 fps (3%)
min: 130     avg: 130.5     median: 130.5 (10%)     max: 131 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
79 fps (7%)
min: 105     avg: 109     median: 109 (10%)     max: 113 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
137 fps (3%)
min: 191     avg: 194.5     median: 194.5 (4%)     max: 198 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
232 fps (10%)
min: 271     avg: 284     median: 284 (12%)     max: 297 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
359 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 732
min: 491     avg: 496     median: 496 (4%)     max: 501 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 333810     avg: 347058     median: 347058 (35%)     max: 360306 Points
455425 Points (46%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 477453     avg: 485942     median: 485942 (39%)     max: 494430 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
120.9 fps (3%)
min: 148.7     avg: 170.1     median: 170.1 (4%)     max: 191.5 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
4056 Points (1%)
7837 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
5338 Points (1%)
9183 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
43633 Points (15%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
54938 Points (91%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
6.3 Watt (2%)
min: 8.05     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (4%)     max: 11 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 153% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 732:
59.9  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 732:
59.7  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 725:
56  fps
104%
Adreno 732:
58.1  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 725:
32  fps
156%
Adreno 732:
40.7 60 ~ 50 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 725:
54  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
147%
Adreno 732:
87.1 89 ~ 88 fps
high
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 732:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 725:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 732:
39.4 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 732:
117  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 121%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 115%

Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 732
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.959.7
Genshin Impact563258.150
PUBG Mobile606040886040
Dead Trigger 2117
Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 732
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1





1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1





2

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 05:11:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12763 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0.018s ... 0.037s

#9 got single benchmarks 11590 +0.004s ... 0.041s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12763 +0s ... 0.041s

#11 got single benchmarks 12763 +0.004s ... 0.045s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.059s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.059s

#15 Got 17 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.062s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.062s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.062s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.064s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.064s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)