Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 722 vs Qualcomm Adreno 725 vs Qualcomm Adreno 710

Qualcomm Adreno 722

► remove from comparison

The Adreno 722 is a relatively high-performance iGPU for Android tablets, phones and handhelds that debuted alongside the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SoC and features an unknown, as of August 2025, number of unified shaders.

Qualcomm Adreno 725

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 725

The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644.

The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.

Qualcomm Adreno 710

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 710

The Adreno 710 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first installed in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The chip has been available since the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, which supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.13.

The GPU is able to control FHD+ displays with up to 144 Hz and offers support for HDR10 and HDR vivid.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 722Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 710
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL 3.2 ES, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Date of Announcement15.05.2025 30.11.2021 30.11.2021
PredecessorAdreno 720
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Adreno 722GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 725GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 710GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 28 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11837 Points (51%)
5762 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
20476 Points (45%)
6231 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
10274 Points (43%)
min: 4356     avg: 5091     median: 5090 (21%)     max: 5765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
14801 Points (37%)
min: 4323     avg: 5373     median: 5490.5 (14%)     max: 6076 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4087     avg: 4575     median: 4720.5 (23%)     max: 4773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3967     avg: 4639     median: 4845 (16%)     max: 4899 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7701 Points (4%)
min: 2311     avg: 2854     median: 3046 (2%)     max: 3502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1968 Points (2%)
min: 599     avg: 736     median: 788 (1%)     max: 901 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
16 fps (6%)
min: 4.5     avg: 5.5     median: 5.8 (2%)     max: 7.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
34 fps (6%)
min: 10     avg: 12.5     median: 13 (2%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
35 fps (3%)
min: 20     avg: 33.2     median: 35 (3%)     max: 44 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
79 fps (7%)
min: 23     avg: 26.9     median: 29 (3%)     max: 30 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
137 fps (3%)
min: 32     avg: 48.4     median: 49.5 (1%)     max: 56 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
232 fps (10%)
min: 62     avg: 68.6     median: 70 (3%)     max: 76 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
359 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 710
min: 105     avg: 116.9     median: 120.5 (1%)     max: 126 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 333810     avg: 347058     median: 347058 (35%)     max: 360306 Points
min: 0     avg: 70941     median: 70940.5 (7%)     max: 141881 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 47395     avg: 103976     median: 118294 (9%)     max: 142082 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
120.9 fps (3%)
min: 38.5     avg: 41.3     median: 40.5 (1%)     max: 45.8 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
38.5 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
4056 Points (1%)
min: 1323     avg: 1513     median: 1334 (0%)     max: 2243 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
5338 Points (1%)
min: 1637     avg: 2122     median: 1671.5 (0%)     max: 3509 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 20418     avg: 26631     median: 27556.5 (9%)     max: 30991 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 24021     avg: 26637     median: 26957 (45%)     max: 28612 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
6.3 Watt (2%)
min: 3.3     avg: 5.2     median: 5 (2%)     max: 9.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 710:
29.9 29.9 30 30 59.2 ~ 36 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 710:
29.6 29.8 29.9 30 44.6 ~ 33 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 725:
56  fps
Adreno 710:
28.8 43 43.8 47 47.1 49 59 ~ 45 fps
ultra
Adreno 725:
32  fps
Adreno 710:
24 29.3 30 31 39 44 46.6 ~ 35 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 725:
54  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 725:
60  fps
Adreno 710:
39 58.6 58.8 59.3 59.6 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
high
Adreno 725:
60  fps
Adreno 710:
30 39.7 40 58.8 59 59.6 60 ~ 50 fps
ultra
Adreno 725:
40  fps
Adreno 710:
39 39.7 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 710:
60 60 115 ~ 78 fps
Qualcomm Adreno 722Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 710
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3633
Genshin Impact56324535
PUBG Mobile606040575040
Dead Trigger 278
Qualcomm Adreno 722Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 710
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1





1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3





1
1

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 23. 22:19:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13181 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12307 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:19:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13181 +0.034s ... 0.042s

#10 got single benchmarks 13181 +0.004s ... 0.046s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0.001s ... 0.047s

#12 got single benchmarks 11590 +0.006s ... 0.054s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 12307 +0.001s ... 0.055s

#14 got single benchmarks 12307 +0.02s ... 0.075s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.016s ... 0.091s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.128s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.128s

#19 Got 51 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.138s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.138s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.138s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.141s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.141s

#24 return log +0s ... 0.142s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)