Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology4 nm14 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 09.04.2019 15.12.2015
PredecessorAdreno 642
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 56690     avg: 67038     median: 68764 (7%)     max: 70216 Points
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
min: 3678     avg: 4551     median: 4663 (20%)     max: 4893 Points
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
min: 4036     avg: 5146     median: 5344 (12%)     max: 5437 Points
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
min: 2934     avg: 3394     median: 3494 (15%)     max: 3605 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
min: 2814     avg: 3435     median: 3554 (9%)     max: 3592 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
min: 2972     avg: 4323     median: 4515 (40%)     max: 4693 Points
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
min: 2844     avg: 4859     median: 5115 (31%)     max: 5832 Points
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
min: 2261     avg: 3146     median: 3267 (16%)     max: 3346 Points
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
min: 2048     avg: 3116     median: 3277 (11%)     max: 3342 Points
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 16.4     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
min: 5.3     avg: 8.3     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 13 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41     avg: 45.3     median: 46 (3%)     max: 49 fps
min: 12     avg: 21.5     median: 23 (2%)     max: 24 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
min: 12     avg: 19.7     median: 21 (2%)     max: 21 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 22     avg: 35     median: 37 (1%)     max: 38 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
min: 31     avg: 50.9     median: 54 (2%)     max: 56 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
min: 48     avg: 88.4     median: 95 (1%)     max: 97 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (14%)
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
30.4 fps (1%)
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (1%)     max: 31.27 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (10%)
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (70%)
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 57% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 52% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 644:
42  fps
71%
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 644:
45  fps
67%
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Adreno 619:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
med.
Adreno 620:
52  fps
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
112%
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
90%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
63%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
65%
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
78%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
78%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
152%
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
150%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps
148%
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 101%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 80%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 96%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%

Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal42453030
Armajet677560
PUBG Mobile604040384031394031
Dead Trigger 2609190
Subway Surfers6190
Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

1


1
3

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1


1
2









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 01:45:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.004s

#12 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.002s ... 0.006s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.006s

#14 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.027s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.027s

#18 Got 178 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.048s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.048s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.048s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.052s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.052s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)