Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Qualcomm Adreno 650

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 650

The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.

The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).

As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering). 

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.

Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 650
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 26.06.2023 04.12.2019
PredecessorAdreno 642
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Core Speed955 MHz250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 MHz587 - 670 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
min: 7970     avg: 9563     median: 9684 (42%)     max: 11492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
min: 11617     avg: 13051     median: 12858 (28%)     max: 16809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
1817 Points (8%)
min: 6960     avg: 8089     median: 8085 (34%)     max: 8975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
1591 Points (4%)
min: 8593     avg: 9728     median: 9498 (24%)     max: 11999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
1.7 fps (1%)
min: 9.7     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (4%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 16.4     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
min: 18     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (4%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41     avg: 45.3     median: 46 (3%)     max: 49 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (4%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
9.6 fps (1%)
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51 (5%)     max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
19 fps (0%)
min: 67     avg: 87.2     median: 88 (2%)     max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
27 fps (1%)
min: 96     avg: 125.1     median: 125 (5%)     max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168     avg: 209.5     median: 206 (2%)     max: 266 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (14%)
49834 Points (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
17.2 fps (0%)
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (2%)     max: 78.57 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
411 Points (0%)
2688 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
626 Points (0%)
2532 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (10%)
54110 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (70%)
42627 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 26% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 130% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 644:
42  fps
143%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 644:
45  fps
133%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
Adreno 650:
60 119 ~ 90 fps
high
Adreno 650:
60 117 ~ 89 fps
ultra
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
Adreno 650:
60 118 ~ 89 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
ultra
Adreno 650:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
Adreno 650:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
Adreno 650:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
106%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 71 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
65%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
102%
Adreno 650:
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
145%
Adreno 650:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
high
100%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
75%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
133%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
167%
Adreno 650:
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 650:
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
high
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 70%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 65%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 133%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 131%

Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 650
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal42456060
Armajet6771
PUBG Mobile6040403929.961585340
Dead Trigger 260100
Subway Surfers61
Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 650
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1











< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2

1


1
2

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 01:45:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.014s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0s ... 0.029s

#12 got single benchmarks 12697 +0s ... 0.029s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0s ... 0.03s

#14 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.032s ... 0.062s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.086s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.086s

#18 Got 178 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.102s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.102s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.102s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.107s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.107s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.107s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)