Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 620 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 690

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 690

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.

The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12
technology14 nm4 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.04.2019 07.05.2021 06.12.2018
PredecessorAdreno 642
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 690GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 38 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.1 pt (3%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.05576 -95%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.0842 -92%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.192 -82%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
1.097
...
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 2936%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 56690     avg: 67038     median: 68764 (7%)     max: 70216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602     avg: 9818     median: 9818 (9%)     max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768     avg: 16708     median: 16707.5 (4%)     max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758     avg: 2835     median: 2834.5 (4%)     max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837     avg: 2933     median: 2932.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3678     avg: 4551     median: 4663 (20%)     max: 4893 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4036     avg: 5146     median: 5344 (12%)     max: 5437 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2934     avg: 3394     median: 3494 (15%)     max: 3605 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2814     avg: 3435     median: 3554 (9%)     max: 3592 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2972     avg: 4323     median: 4515 (40%)     max: 4693 Points
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 2844     avg: 4859     median: 5115 (31%)     max: 5832 Points
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2261     avg: 3146     median: 3267 (16%)     max: 3346 Points
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 2048     avg: 3116     median: 3277 (11%)     max: 3342 Points
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3077 (4%)     max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898     avg: 2930     median: 2912 (2%)     max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.3     avg: 8.3     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 13 fps
min: 15     avg: 16.4     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 21.5     median: 23 (2%)     max: 24 fps
min: 41     avg: 45.3     median: 46 (3%)     max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 19.7     median: 21 (2%)     max: 21 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 22     avg: 35     median: 37 (1%)     max: 38 fps
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 31     avg: 50.9     median: 54 (2%)     max: 56 fps
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 48     avg: 88.4     median: 95 (1%)     max: 97 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
30.4 fps (1%)
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
42541 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 187% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 692% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
26  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
22.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
17  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.6  fps
Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
med.
100%
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
89%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
158%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
129%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 20.7 21.3 ~ 14 fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 18 18.9 ~ 12 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 16.1 16.3 ~ 11 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
19  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
7.3  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
57.1 57.5 58.7 ~ 58 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
54.5 54.5 55.2 ~ 55 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
38.8 45.9 47 ~ 44 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
29.4 40.2 40.7 ~ 37 fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 35 38.6 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 31.5 ~ 16 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 19.1 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 8.5 ~ 4 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
29.9  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
66%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 108%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 108%

Qualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 690
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 222622.51712.6
X-Plane 11.11141211
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1912.37.29
Dota 2 Reborn58554437
The Witcher 32516104
GTA V29.9
Qualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 690
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
1

4
1

4
1

2
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 01:40:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.002s ... 0.016s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.017s

#12 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.007s ... 0.032s

#14 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.005s ... 0.037s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.058s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.058s

#18 Got 99 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.069s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.069s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.07s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.075s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.075s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)