Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 619LQualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology8 nm5 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 07.05.2021 07.05.2021
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
5587 Points (24%)
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
8380 Points (18%)
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (10%)     max: 2348 Points
4478 Points (19%)
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (5%)     max: 2187 Points
6148 Points (15%)
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (29%)     max: 3215 Points
6989 Points (62%)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197     avg: 3201     median: 3200.5 (19%)     max: 3204 Points
8588 Points (52%)
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178     avg: 2188     median: 2188 (11%)     max: 2198 Points
5098 Points (25%)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982     avg: 1987     median: 1987 (7%)     max: 1992 Points
6087 Points (20%)
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
3212 Points (2%)
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (1%)     max: 15 fps
40 fps (4%)
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
65 fps (1%)
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
90 fps (4%)
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (8%)
162946 Points (16%)
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (1%)     max: 22.85 fps
48 fps (1%)
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
42541 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 260% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 269% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 642:
30  fps
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
150%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
150%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
148%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
133%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
ultra
Adreno 642:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 642:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
207%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 176%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 176%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 121%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 121%

Qualcomm Adreno 619LQualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet3067
PUBG Mobile40403060596040604040
Dead Trigger 26060
Subway Surfers61
Qualcomm Adreno 619LQualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1


1
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1

1


1
1

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 01:42:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0s ... 0.003s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0s ... 0.004s

#12 got single benchmarks 10693 +0s ... 0.004s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.004s

#14 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.005s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.017s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.017s

#18 Got 32 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.022s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.022s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.022s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.025s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.025s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.025s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)