Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology8 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 26.06.2023 07.05.2021
Core Speed955 MHz
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
1817 Points (8%)
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
1591 Points (4%)
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
1.7 fps (1%)
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
4 fps (1%)
min: 15     avg: 16.4     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
min: 41     avg: 45.3     median: 46 (3%)     max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
9.6 fps (1%)
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
19 fps (0%)
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
27 fps (1%)
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
49834 Points (4%)
170281 Points (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (1%)     max: 31.27 fps
17.2 fps (0%)
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
411 Points (0%)
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
626 Points (0%)
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
42541 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 54% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 211% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
140%
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
150%
Adreno 644:
45  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 619:
30  fps
291%
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
105%
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
53%
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
112%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
100%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
154%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
96%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
129%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
67%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 619:
90  fps
68%
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 129%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 115%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 115%

Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal30304245
League of Legends: Wild Rift306087.359.6
Genshin Impact37362738.914.4
Armajet6067
PUBG Mobile3940313929.9604040
Dead Trigger 29060
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers9061
Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1



1


1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 01:40:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.009s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0s ... 0.021s

#12 got single benchmarks 12697 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.026s

#14 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.001s ... 0.027s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.046s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.046s

#18 Got 140 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.062s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.062s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.062s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.066s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.066s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.067s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)