Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Core Speed955 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm7 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement26.06.2023 02.12.2020 07.05.2021
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 18 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
200519 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 8065     avg: 10160     median: 10372 (45%)     max: 11534 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1817 Points (8%)
min: 5094     avg: 8481     median: 8770 (37%)     max: 9839 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1591 Points (4%)
min: 7930     avg: 11533     median: 11753 (29%)     max: 12914 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7991     avg: 8422     median: 8055 (72%)     max: 9221 Points
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10111     avg: 11212     median: 10261 (62%)     max: 13263 Points
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 6140     avg: 6868     median: 6868 (34%)     max: 7596 Points
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 6816     avg: 8126     median: 8126 (27%)     max: 9436 Points
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
min: 3959     avg: 5588     median: 5761.5 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
min: 974     avg: 1423     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.7 fps (1%)
min: 11     avg: 12.3     median: 13 (5%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4 fps (1%)
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
min: 39     avg: 69.2     median: 71 (5%)     max: 87 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
9.6 fps (1%)
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
19 fps (0%)
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
27 fps (1%)
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
49834 Points (4%)
170281 Points (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
17.2 fps (0%)
min: 107.62     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (3%)     max: 109.3 fps
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
411 Points (0%)
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
626 Points (0%)
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (18%)
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (70%)
42541 Points (70%)
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 688% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 409% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
69%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
high
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 ~ 119 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
101%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Adreno 660:
91  fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
152%
Adreno 660:
59.3  fps
med.
Adreno 660:
58.8  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
386%
Adreno 660:
55.6  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
169%
Adreno 660:
59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 66 fps
154%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
181%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
134%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 660:
166  fps
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 660:
60  fps
high
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 176%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 176%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 144%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 144%

Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet7267
PUBG Mobile3929.966605440604040
Dead Trigger 216660
Subway Surfers61
Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1











< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1


1

1
1
1

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 02:49:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0.015s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 12697 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0s ... 0.027s

#12 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.024s ... 0.05s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.051s

#14 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.001s ... 0.052s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.072s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.072s

#18 Got 131 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.083s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.083s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.083s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.086s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.087s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)