Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs Qualcomm Adreno 618 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Qualcomm Adreno 618

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 618 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 and 730G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In our benchmarks, the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 was 14 to 30% faster than the Adreno 616 in the Snapdragon 710. The performance in the 730G should be additional 15% faster, due to higher clock rates.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642L

The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 618Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Core Speed955 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm14 nm6 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement26.06.2023 09.04.2019 07.05.2021
CPU in Adreno 618GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 28 x 2550 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c8 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.500 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 38 x 2400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 642L
0.3 pt (1%)
0.05576 -82%
0.0842 -73%
0.192 -39%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143
...
0.3143 0%
max:
33.3 10495%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
min: 46148     avg: 74921     median: 88482 (9%)     max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
30747 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
4790 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
5577 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
min: 782     avg: 789     median: 788.5 (1%)     max: 795 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (0%)
min: 832     avg: 840     median: 840 (1%)     max: 848 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
37738 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1817 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1591 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
min: 258     avg: 447     median: 313 (0%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624     avg: 639     median: 645 (1%)     max: 648 Points
min: 1067     avg: 1072     median: 1072 (1%)     max: 1077 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572     avg: 590     median: 599 (0%)     max: 599 Points
min: 995     avg: 996     median: 996 (1%)     max: 997 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.15     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (0%)     max: 8.38 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
9.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
19 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
27 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 74888     avg: 89032     median: 90943.5 (9%)     max: 95350 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
49834 Points (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
17.2 fps (0%)
min: 23.89     avg: 26.3     median: 26.3 (1%)     max: 28.78 fps
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (1%)     max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
411 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
626 Points (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
42 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
53 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
944 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10269     avg: 16045     median: 10289 (4%)     max: 27578 Points
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (11%)     max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3043     avg: 9739     median: 3056 (5%)     max: 23117 Points
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (67%)     max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
3.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 160% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 323% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
131%
Adreno 618:
114  fps
high
Adreno 618:
99  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
140%
Adreno 618:
83.5  fps
102%
Adreno 642L:
61  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Adreno 618:
60  fps
high
Adreno 618:
58  fps
ultra
Adreno 618:
57  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 618:
30 30 60.5 65 71 82 ~ 56 fps
Adreno 642L:
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
97%
Adreno 618:
30 38 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
149%
Adreno 642L:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
med.
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
100%
Adreno 618:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
127%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 618:
30 60 60 61 61 ~ 54 fps
ultra
Adreno 618:
30 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 55 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 618:
60  fps
high
Adreno 618:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
low 1280x720
Adreno 618:
27.6  fps
Adreno 642L:
33.7 36.2 ~ 35 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 618:
19.7  fps
Adreno 642L:
25 26.3 ~ 26 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 618:
9.6  fps
Adreno 642L:
14.8 14.8 ~ 15 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 618:
8.7  fps
Adreno 642L:
13 13 ~ 13 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 642L:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
Adreno 618:
30  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 618:
27 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 618:
27 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
low 1280x720
Adreno 618:
23  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 618:
17.6  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 618:
16.9  fps
low 1024x768
Adreno 618:
20.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 618:
20  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 618:
17.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 618:
12  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 642L:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 117%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 97%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 126%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 126%

Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 618Qualcomm Adreno 642L
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5956
League of Legends: Wild Rift87.359.61149983.561
Armajet5689
PUBG Mobile3929.9384030584038
Dota 2 Reborn27.619.79.68.735261513
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends30303030
Subway Surfers90
Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 618Qualcomm Adreno 642L
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1



1



1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2
1
1
1

1
3
1
1

1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4

1
1

1
2
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 01:47:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0s ... 0.004s

#10 got single benchmarks 12697 +0s ... 0.004s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0s ... 0.004s

#12 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#14 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.03s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.03s

#18 Got 143 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.045s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.045s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.046s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.051s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.051s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)