Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 619L
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600Adreno 600
Core Speed955 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology4 nm14 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement26.06.2023 15.12.2015 15.12.2015
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (3%)     max: 31129 Points
44899 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (8%)     max: 2344 Points
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1817 Points (8%)
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (5%)     max: 1499 Points
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (10%)     max: 2348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1591 Points (4%)
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (2%)     max: 1303 Points
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (5%)     max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1606     avg: 1849     median: 1745 (16%)     max: 2285 Points
min: 3208     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (29%)     max: 3215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1427     avg: 1715     median: 1594 (10%)     max: 2173 Points
min: 3197     avg: 3201     median: 3200.5 (19%)     max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 937     avg: 1108     median: 978 (5%)     max: 1480 Points
min: 2178     avg: 2188     median: 2188 (11%)     max: 2198 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 823     avg: 952     median: 829 (3%)     max: 1286 Points
min: 1982     avg: 1987     median: 1987 (7%)     max: 1992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
482 Points (0%)
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
143 Points (0%)
247 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4 fps (1%)
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
5.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
9.6 fps (1%)
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.2 fps
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (1%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
19 fps (0%)
min: 14     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
27 fps (1%)
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (1%)     max: 25 fps
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (4%)
76440 Points (8%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
49834 Points (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
17.2 fps (0%)
14.3 fps (0%)
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (1%)     max: 22.85 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
411 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
626 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (6%)     max: 23891 Points
13095 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (14%)     max: 15659 Points
1751 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 77% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 137% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
101%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 612:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
103%
Adreno 612:
40  fps
103%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
100%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
high
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 101%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 101%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 619L
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift87.359.660
Genshin Impact38.914.4
PUBG Mobile3929.94030404030
Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 619L
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1



1


1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1


1



1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 02:59:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0.006s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 12697 +0.002s ... 0.01s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0s ... 0.011s

#12 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0s ... 0.017s

#14 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.035s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.035s

#18 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.038s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.038s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.039s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.042s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.042s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)