Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 610 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620

Qualcomm Adreno 610

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 620
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
technology11 nm5 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement09.04.2019 07.05.2021 09.04.2019
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 1050 MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 975     avg: 1855     median: 1827.5 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1295     avg: 1759     median: 1746.5 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 267     avg: 1178     median: 1175.5 (5%)     max: 1597 Points
4478 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 240     avg: 1040     median: 1033 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
6148 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1400     avg: 1836     median: 1797 (16%)     max: 2222 Points
6989 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1270     avg: 1713     median: 1691 (10%)     max: 2095 Points
8588 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 854     avg: 1210     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1905 Points
5098 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 726     avg: 1040     median: 1021 (3%)     max: 1394 Points
6087 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 205     avg: 414.2     median: 433 (0%)     max: 634 Points
3212 Points (2%)
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
786 Points (1%)
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 5.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
40 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 9.3     avg: 13.3     median: 13 (0%)     max: 16 fps
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 19.5     median: 19 (1%)     max: 24 fps
90 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 24     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (0%)     max: 45 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
162946 Points (16%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 40315     avg: 41445     median: 40525 (3%)     max: 44415 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
48 fps (1%)
30.4 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 343     avg: 347.7     median: 349 (0%)     max: 351 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
577 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (6%)     max: 21734 Points
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (22%)     max: 20711 Points
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.25     avg: 3.4     median: 3 (1%)     max: 6.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 512% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 298% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 610:
25.6  fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
26.5  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 610:
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps
102%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 610:
42 59 ~ 51 fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
40  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
29  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 610:
26.3 27.7 29.2 37 37 ~ 31 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 610:
15  fps
347%
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
11 13 13.1 14 15 ~ 13 fps
177%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps
58%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
144%
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 38.8 39.8 ~ 31 fps
194%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
123%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 610:
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 29.5 29.9 ~ 25 fps
236%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
160%
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
25  fps
240%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
124%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
ultra
Adreno 642:
40  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
118%
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
118%
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 610:
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps
147%
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 610:
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 610:
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps
300%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
145%
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 610:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 205%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 234%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 147%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 149%

Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.5
League of Legends: Wild Rift6059606060
Call of Duty Mobile514029
Genshin Impact3115135223
Armajet523075
PUBG Mobile31252560596040384031
Arena of Valor38384545
Dead Trigger 26291
Asphalt 9: Legends302060603029
Temple Run 260
Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2

1


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
1

2

1
1
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 04:11:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:29:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.046s ... 0.06s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0s ... 0.061s

#12 got single benchmarks 10693 +0s ... 0.061s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.061s

#14 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.003s ... 0.063s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.086s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.086s

#18 Got 164 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.11s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.11s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.11s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.115s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.115s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.116s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)